@article {06199869875, title = {Shared control in haptic systems for performance enhancement and training}, journal = {Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement and Control, Transactions of the ASME}, volume = {128}, number = {1}, year = {2006}, note = {

Virtual environments;Mass-spring-damper;System dynamics;Shared control;

}, pages = {75 - 85}, chapter = {75}, abstract = {

This paper presents a shared-control interaction paradigm for haptic interface systems, with experimental data from two user studies. Shared control, evolved from its initial telerobotics applications, is adapted as a form of haptic assistance in that the haptic device contributes to execution of a dynamic manual target-hitting task via force commands from an automatic controller. Compared to haptic virtual environments, which merely display the physics of the virtual system, or to passive methods of haptic assistance for performance enhancement based on virtual fixtures, the shared-control approach offers a method for actively demonstrating desired motions during virtual environment interactions. The paper presents a thorough review of the literature related to haptic assistance. In addition, two experiments were conducted to independently verify the efficacy of the shared-control approach for performance enhancement and improved training effectiveness of the task. In the first experiment, shared control is found to be as effective as virtual fixtures for performance enhancement, with both methods resulting in significantly better performance in terms of time between target hits for the manual target-hitting task than sessions where subjects feel only the forces arising from the mass-spring-damper system dynamics. Since shared control is more general than virtual fixtures, this approach may be extremely beneficial for performance enhancement in virtual environments. In terms of training enhancement, shared control and virtual fixtures were no better than practice in an unassisted mode. For manual control tasks, such as the one described in this paper, shared control is beneficial for performance enhancement, but may not be viable for enhancing training effectiveness. Copyright \© 2006 by ASME.

}, keywords = {Control equipment, Damping, Data reduction, Haptic interfaces, Robotics, Robots}, issn = {0022-0434}, doi = {10.1115/1.2168160 }, url = {http://scitation.aip.org/getabs/servlet/GetabsServlet?prog=normal\&id=JDSMAA000128000001000075000001\&idtype=cvips\&gifs=yes}, attachments = {https://mahilab.rice.edu/sites/default/files/publications/52-00\%20-\%20JDSMC\%20Shared\%20control.pdf}, author = {O{\textquoteright}Malley, M.K. and Abhishek Gupta and Gen, Matthew and Yanfang Li} } @proceedings {04278244642, title = {Cooperative manipulation between humans and teleoperated agents}, year = {2004}, note = {

Robonauts;Haptic feedback;Cooperative manipulation;

}, pages = {114 - 120}, address = {Chicago, IL, United States}, abstract = {

Robonaut is a humanoid robot designed by the Robotic Systems Technology Branch at NASA{\textquoteright}s Johnson Space Center in a collaborative effort with DARPA. This paper describes the implementation of haptic feedback into Robonaut. We conducted a cooperative manipulation task, inserting a flexible beam into an instrumented receptacle. This task was performed while both a human at the worksite and the teleoperated robot grasped the flexible beam simultaneously. Peak forces in the receptacle were consistently lower when the human operator was provided with kinesthetic force feedback in addition to other modalities of feedback such as gestures and voice commands. These findings are encouraging as the Dexterous Robotics Lab continues to implement force feedback into its teleoperator hardware architecture.

}, keywords = {Computer simulation, Feedback, Haptic interfaces, Human computer interaction, Robots, Statistical methods}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/HAPTIC.2004.1287185}, attachments = {https://mahilab.rice.edu/sites/default/files/publications/glassmire2004haptics.pdf}, author = {John Glassmire and O{\textquoteright}Malley, M.K. and William Bluethmann and Robert O. Ambrose} } @proceedings {05239144488, title = {Design of a haptic arm exoskeleton for training and rehabilitation}, volume = {73}, number = {2 PART B}, year = {2004}, note = {

Haptic arm exoskeleton;Inertia;Structural stiffness;Kinesthetic feedback;

}, pages = {1011 - 1018}, address = {Anaheim, CA, United States}, abstract = {

A high-quality haptic interface is typically characterized by low apparent inertia and damping, high structural stiffness, minimal backlash and absence of mechanical singularities in the workspace. In addition to these specifications, exoskeleton haptic interface design involves consideration of additional parameters and constraints including space and weight limitations, workspace requirements and the kinematic constraints placed on the device by the human arm. In this context, we present the design of a five degree-of-freedom haptic arm exoskeleton for training and rehabilitation in virtual environments. The design of the device, including actuator and sensor selection, is discussed. Limitations of the device that result from the above selections are also presented. The device is capable of providing kinesthetic feedback to the joints of the lower arm and wrist of the operator, and will be used in future work for robot-assisted rehabilitation and training. Copyright {\textcopyright} 2004 by ASME.

}, keywords = {Actuators, Bandwidth, Damping, Degrees of freedom (mechanics), Friction, Human computer interaction, Kinematics, Robotic arms, Robots, Sensors, Stiffness}, attachments = {https://mahilab.rice.edu/sites/default/files/publications/gupta2004asme.pdf}, author = {Abhishek Gupta and O{\textquoteright}Malley, M.K.} }