@proceedings {1471, title = {On the Correlation between Motion Data Captured from Low-Cost Gaming Controller and High Precision Encoders}, year = {2012}, month = {8/2012}, attachments = {https://mahilab.rice.edu/sites/default/files/publications/EMBS2012_FINAL_Purkayastha.pdf}, author = {S.N. Purkayastha and M.D. Byrne and O{\textquoteright}Malley, M.K.} } @proceedings {773, title = {Co-presentation of Force Cues for Skill Transfer via Shared-control Systems}, year = {2010}, abstract = {

During training and rehabilitation with haptic devices, it is often necessary to simultaneously present force cues arising from different haptic models (such as guidance cues and environmental forces). Multiple force cues are typically summed to produce a single output force, which conveys only relative information about the original force cues and may not be useful to trainees. Two force copresentation paradigms are proposed as potential solutions to this problem: temporal separation of force cues, where one type of force is overlaid with the other in staggered pulses, and spatial separation, where the forces are presented via multiple haptic devices. A generalized model for separating task and guidance forces in a virtual environment is also proposed. In a pilot study where sixteen participants were trained in a dynamic target-hitting task using these co-presentation paradigms, simple summation was in fact most effective at eliciting skill transfer in most respects. Spatial separation imposed the lowest overall workload on participants, however, and might thus be more appropriate than summation in tasks with other significant physical or mental demands. Temporal separation was relatively inferior at eliciting skill transfer, but it is hypothesized that this paradigm would have performed considerably better in a non-rhythmic task, and the need for further research is indicated.

}, attachments = {https://mahilab.rice.edu/sites/default/files/publications/773-Submission.pdf}, author = {Powell, Dane and O{\textquoteright}Malley, M.K.} } @proceedings {111, title = {Compact and low-cost tendon vibrator for inducing proprioceptive illusions}, year = {2009}, month = {03/2009}, publisher = {IEEE}, address = {Salt Lake City, Utah}, abstract = {

Recent literature suggests that inducing proprioceptive movement illusions with predefined movement trajectories via tendon vibration requires use of multiple vibrators and precisely controlled frequency profiles. In this study, we report the design, modeling and control of a compact, low-cost tendon vibrator and illustrate its capability of accurately following time-varying frequency profiles. During the demonstration, participants will test the vibrator to experience illusory elbow flexion.

}, keywords = {artificial proprioception, proprioceptive illusions, tendon vibration}, attachments = {https://mahilab.rice.edu/sites/default/files/publications/111-Celik2009WHC.pdf}, author = {Ozkan Celik and O{\textquoteright}Malley, M.K. and Brent Gillespie and Shewokis, Patricia A. and Contreras-Vidal, Jose Luis} } @proceedings {celik_comparison, title = {Comparison of robotic and clinical motor function improvement measures for sub-acute stroke patients}, year = {2008}, pages = {2477{\textendash}2482}, address = {Pasadena, CA}, abstract = {

In this paper, preliminary results in motor function improvement for four sub-acute stroke patients that underwent a hybrid robotic and traditional rehabilitation program are presented. The therapy program was scheduled for three days a week, four hours per day (approximately 60\% traditional constraint induced therapy activities and 40\% robotic therapy). A haptic joystick was used to implement four different operating modes for robotic therapy: unassisted (U), constrained (C), assisted (A), and resisted (R) modes. A target hitting task involving the positioning of a pointer on twelve targets was completed by the patients. Two different robotic measures were utilized to quantify the motor function improvement through the sessions: trajectory error (TE) and smoothness of movement (SM). Fugl-Meyer (FM) and motor activity log (MAL) scales were used as clinical measures. Analysis of results showed that the group demonstrates a significant motor function improvement with respect to both clinical and robotic measures. Regression analyses were carried out on corresponding clinical and robotic measure result pairs. A significant relation between FM scale and robotic measures was found for both of the analyzed modes. Regression of robotic measures on MAL scores resulted in no significance. A regression analysis that compared the two clinical measures revealed a very low agreement. Our findings suggest that it might be possible to obtain objective robotic measures that are significantly correlated to widely-used and reliable clinical measures in considerably different operating modes and control schemes.

}, keywords = {robotic rehabilitation}, attachments = {https://mahilab.rice.edu/sites/default/files/publications/74-CelikICRA2008.pdf}, author = {Ozkan Celik and O{\textquoteright}Malley, M.K. and Boake, Corwin and H.S. Levin and Fischer, Steven and Reistetter, Timothy} } @proceedings {04278244649, title = {Comparison of human haptic size discrimination performance in simulated environments with varying levels of force and stiffness}, year = {2004}, note = {

Size discrimination experiments;Machine quality;Haptic devices;

}, pages = {169 - 175}, address = {Chicago, IL, United States}, abstract = {

The performance levels of human subjects in size discrimination experiments in virtual environments with varying levels of stiffness and force saturation are presented. The virtual environments are displayed with a Phantom desktop three degree-of-freedom haptic interface. Performance was measured at below maximum machine performance levels for two machine parameters: maximum endpoint force and maximum virtual surface stiffness. The tabulated scores for the size discrimination in the sub-optimal virtual environments, except for those of the lowest stiffness, 100 N/m, were found to be comparable to that in the highest-quality virtual environment. This supports previous claims that haptic interface hardware may be able to convey, for this perceptual task, sufficient perceptual information to the user with relatively low levels of machine quality in terms of these parameters, as long as certain minimum levels, 1.0 N force and 220 N/m stiffness, are met.

}, keywords = {Computer simulation, Computer software, Degrees of freedom (mechanics), Feedback, Haptic interfaces, Human engineering, Stiffness}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/HAPTIC.2004.1287193}, attachments = {https://mahilab.rice.edu/sites/default/files/publications/upperman2004haptics.pdf}, author = {Gina Upperman and Suzuki, Atsushi and O{\textquoteright}Malley, M.K.} } @proceedings {04278244642, title = {Cooperative manipulation between humans and teleoperated agents}, year = {2004}, note = {

Robonauts;Haptic feedback;Cooperative manipulation;

}, pages = {114 - 120}, address = {Chicago, IL, United States}, abstract = {

Robonaut is a humanoid robot designed by the Robotic Systems Technology Branch at NASA{\textquoteright}s Johnson Space Center in a collaborative effort with DARPA. This paper describes the implementation of haptic feedback into Robonaut. We conducted a cooperative manipulation task, inserting a flexible beam into an instrumented receptacle. This task was performed while both a human at the worksite and the teleoperated robot grasped the flexible beam simultaneously. Peak forces in the receptacle were consistently lower when the human operator was provided with kinesthetic force feedback in addition to other modalities of feedback such as gestures and voice commands. These findings are encouraging as the Dexterous Robotics Lab continues to implement force feedback into its teleoperator hardware architecture.

}, keywords = {Computer simulation, Feedback, Haptic interfaces, Human computer interaction, Robots, Statistical methods}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/HAPTIC.2004.1287185}, attachments = {https://mahilab.rice.edu/sites/default/files/publications/glassmire2004haptics.pdf}, author = {John Glassmire and O{\textquoteright}Malley, M.K. and William Bluethmann and Robert O. Ambrose} }